THE recent Labour Party pledge to freeze energy bills demonstrated
how to have a political cake and eat it. The pledge is an attempt to
rectify a heinous political mistake caused by political hubris and
vanity.
In 2008, the then energy minister, Ed Miliband, vowed to enact the
most stringent cuts in power emissions in the entire world to achieve an
unrealistic 80 per cent cut in carbon emissions by closing down fully
functioning coal power stations.
He was playing the role of climate saint to win popularity and votes.
I was a member when Ed Miliband spoke in Oxford Town Hall to loud
cheers from numerous low-carbon businesses, who stood to profit from his
legislation. I was concerned at the impact on the consumer, since it is
widely known that coal power stations offer the cheapest energy to
consumers compared to nuclear and wind.
So I wrote to Andrew Smith MP at great length and he passed on my
concerns to the newly-formed Department of Energy and Climate Change
that had replaced the previous Department of Energy and Business.
This new department sent me a lengthy reply, mapping out their plans
for wind turbines at a projected cost to the consumer of £100bn to
include new infrastructure and amendments to the National Grid. This
cost would be added to consumer electricity bills via a hidden green
policy tariff.
This has already happened and explains the rise in utility bills.
Some consumers are confused and wrongly believe that energy companies are ‘ripping them off’.
It was clearly stated on Channel 4 recently that energy bills have
risen to pay for new policy changes. These policy changes were enacted
by Ed Miliband in his popularity bid to play climate saviour in 2008.
Energy bills have now rocketed. So Ed has cost every single consumer in
the land several hundred pounds extra on their bills each year.
SUSAN THOMAS, Magdalen Road, Oxford
LETTERS
Daily Mail
14th October 2013
[ Turned off: Didcot power station's closure could lead to power cuts. ]
Labour’s power failures will cost us all dear
THE Labour Party’s pledge to freeze energy bills is an attempt to
rectify a horrible political mistake. But it might be too late to dig us
out of the financial black hole caused by political vanity.
In 2008, then Energy Minister Ed Miliband vowed to enact the most
stringent cuts in power emissions in the world to achieve an unrealistic
80 per cent cut in carbon emissions by closing down coal power
stations. He was playing the role of climate saint to win votes.
I was in the audience in Oxford Town Hall that day and recall the
loud cheers from numerous representatives of low-carbon businesses as
his policies stood to make them all rather wealthy, albeit at the
expense of every electricity consumer in the land.
I thought Ed had become entangled in a spider’s web.
I was concerned at the impact on the consumer as it’s widely known
that coal power stations offer the cheapest energy to consumers.
I contacted the Department of Energy and Climate Change and it sent
me a lengthy reply mapping out its plans for energy projects and wind
turbines – at a projected cost to the consumer of £100 billion –
including new infrastructure and national grid amendments.
It explained the cost would be added to consumer electricity bills
via a ‘green policy’ tariff. This has now happened and explains the rise
in utility bills.
Some consumers wrongly believe the energy companies are ripping them
off. In fact, energy bills have risen to pay for policy changes.
The people to benefit from this are low-carbon venture capitalists
and rich landowners who reap subsidy money (which ultimately comes from
the hard-hit consumer) for having wind farms on their land.
Since Didcot power station closed I’ve suffered five power cuts in my
Oxford home. If we have a cold winter, we now have a one-in-four chance
of a power cut.
The 2008 legislation was a huge mistake. When power cuts happen,
people will be forced to burn filthy coal and wood in their grates to
keep warm, emitting cancer-causing particulates.
Didcot had already got rid of these asthma-causing particulates and
smoke. It emitted mainly steam and carbon dioxide which aren’t harmful
to our lungs. But the clean, non-toxic carbon dioxide emitted by Didcot
was classified by Mr Miliband as a pollutant. We are heading into a
public health and financial disaster.
SUSAN THOMAS, Oxford
No comments:
Post a Comment